Sacramento El Dorado Yolo Placer San Joaquin Employment Labor Attorneys Lawyers for NursesValerie Alberts and others (hereafter plaintiffs), formerly employed as members of the nursing staff at two acute care psychiatric hospitals owned and operated by Aurora Behavioral Health Care (Aurora), filed the instant wage and hour lawsuit alleging, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, that Aurora’s uniform practices and de facto policies routinely denied nursing staff employees meal and rest periods required by California law.  Plaintiffs allege Aurora intentionally understaffed its hospitals while simultaneously requiring nursing staff to remain at their posts and monitoring patients unless relieved, resulting in class members being denied meal and rest breaks (and failing to pay additional compensation required by California law).  Plaintiffs further allege that Aurora required nursing staff members to complete outstanding assignments before leaving at the end of a shift, but actively discouraged or  denied requests for overtime compensation and instructed employees to finish outstanding tasks off-the-clock.  Plaintiffs proposed five subclasses:  the meal break subclass, the rest break subclass, the overtime subclass, and two derivative subclasses for waiting time penalties owed and inaccurate wage statements.

The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, finding a lack of “commonality” among the subclasses.  We conclude the court relied on improper criteria and erroneous legal assumptions in denying certification.  However, while we believe that the plaintiffs’ theory of liability presents a common question well-suited for class treatment, it is unclear what effect, if any, individual issues, such as damages, will have on the manageability of the case.  As our Supreme Court has cautioned, “Trial courts must pay careful attention to manageability when deciding whether to certify a class action.  In considering whether a class action is a superior device for resolving a controversy, the manageability of individual issues is just as important as the existence of common questions uniting the proposed class.  If the court makes a reasoned, informed decision about manageability at the certification stage, the litigants can plan accordingly and the court will have less need to intervene later to control the proceedings.”  (Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn. (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1, 29.)  Here, the parties and the trial court focused almost exclusively on the existence of common issues, to the exclusion of the issue of manageability.  Accordingly, we reverse and remand the matter for further consideration consistent with our holding.

The case is Alberts v. Aurora Behavioral Health Care (CA2/1 B248748 10/16/15).

The Sacramento-based labor and employment attorneys at Rose Law represent healthcare professionals, including psychiatric nurses and nursing staff, in individual, class action, and collective action lawsuits for unpaid wages, overtime, and other claims under the California Labor Code and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). We handle cases everywhere in California from three law offices in Gold River, Modesto, and Ventura. For a case evaluation, contact our legal team at 1-800-456-3767, or complete and submit the form on this page.

Leave a Reply

nineteen + 19 =

Contact Us

captcha
Enter code above